<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 948 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399974</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of in accordance with the legal provisions, emphasizing the necessity for the appellant to follow the prescribed procedures for revocation of the GST registration cancellation. The Additional Commissioner directed the appellant to adhere to Rule 23 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and a circular from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes &amp;amp; Customs for further action by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 948 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399974</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of in accordance with the legal provisions, emphasizing the necessity for the appellant to follow the prescribed procedures for revocation of the GST registration cancellation. The Additional Commissioner directed the appellant to adhere to Rule 23 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and a circular from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes &amp;amp; Customs for further action by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>