https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399973 The appeal by M/S Shyam Electroplating against the cancellation of their GSTIN registration due to non-filing of returns was disposed of by the Additional Commissioner. The appellant's request for revocation was denied as they failed to comply with Rule 23 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and circular No.99/18/2019-GST, which required filing of returns and payment of taxes before applying for revocation. The appellant was instructed to follow the prescribed procedure for revocation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Thu, 16 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399973 The appeal by M/S Shyam Electroplating against the cancellation of their GSTIN registration due to non-filing of returns was disposed of by the Additional Commissioner. The appellant's request for revocation was denied as they failed to comply with Rule 23 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and circular No.99/18/2019-GST, which required filing of returns and payment of taxes before applying for revocation. The appellant was instructed to follow the prescribed procedure for revocation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399973