<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 921 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399947</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the impugned order regarding the provisional release of seized betel nuts, remanding the matter to the Commissioner of Customs for reconsideration. The Court directed compliance with Delhi and Madras HC judgments, emphasizing discretion in applying Circular No. 35/2017-Cus and allowing a lower deposit for provisional release, ensuring a fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 921 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399947</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the impugned order regarding the provisional release of seized betel nuts, remanding the matter to the Commissioner of Customs for reconsideration. The Court directed compliance with Delhi and Madras HC judgments, emphasizing discretion in applying Circular No. 35/2017-Cus and allowing a lower deposit for provisional release, ensuring a fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>