<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23599</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deduction of borrowed monies and debts due, based on a previous decision. The court also held that a specific sum received on the transfer of import entitlements was not exempt from tax and rejected the claim for interest paid to the Income-tax Department as a deduction from total income. Additionally, the court denied the interest payment as a loss on commercial principles. The judgment allowed an appeal to the Supreme Court for the second and third questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:41:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23599</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deduction of borrowed monies and debts due, based on a previous decision. The court also held that a specific sum received on the transfer of import entitlements was not exempt from tax and rejected the claim for interest paid to the Income-tax Department as a deduction from total income. Additionally, the court denied the interest payment as a loss on commercial principles. The judgment allowed an appeal to the Supreme Court for the second and third questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>