<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 913 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, directing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to resume from the stage of considering all Resolution Plans, including the Appellant&#039;s revised plan. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) was instructed to evaluate all plans within the extended timelines, excluding the period of judicial intervention from the computation of the extended timelines. The Tribunal found the rejection of the Appellant&#039;s revised offer by the Resolution Professional to be unjustified and emphasized the need for fair consideration of all plans within the framework of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 913 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, directing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to resume from the stage of considering all Resolution Plans, including the Appellant&#039;s revised plan. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) was instructed to evaluate all plans within the extended timelines, excluding the period of judicial intervention from the computation of the extended timelines. The Tribunal found the rejection of the Appellant&#039;s revised offer by the Resolution Professional to be unjustified and emphasized the need for fair consideration of all plans within the framework of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>