https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290985 Additional evidence at the appellate stage under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC is exceptional and may be admitted only when the statutory grounds of due diligence, necessity for judgment, or substantial cause are strictly satisfied; evidence already available throughout the proceedings cannot be used to fill gaps in the record. In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, concurrent findings of fact are not open to interference unless they are shown to be perverse, arbitrary, or to give rise to a substantial question of law. On the stated facts, the application for additional evidence was rejected and the respondent's decree was upheld. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:59:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290985 Additional evidence at the appellate stage under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC is exceptional and may be admitted only when the statutory grounds of due diligence, necessity for judgment, or substantial cause are strictly satisfied; evidence already available throughout the proceedings cannot be used to fill gaps in the record. In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, concurrent findings of fact are not open to interference unless they are shown to be perverse, arbitrary, or to give rise to a substantial question of law. On the stated facts, the application for additional evidence was rejected and the respondent's decree was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290985