https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399930 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was first returned on the jurisdictional position then prevailing, and later sought to be restored after the amendment to Section 142 took effect. The court found that the restoration merely enabled consideration of the complaint under the amended jurisdictional regime and did not prejudice either side. The absence of notice was not treated as fatal on the facts. The restoration order was therefore not illegal or irregular, and the challenge to it failed. en-us Mon, 12 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399930 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was first returned on the jurisdictional position then prevailing, and later sought to be restored after the amendment to Section 142 took effect. The court found that the restoration merely enabled consideration of the complaint under the amended jurisdictional regime and did not prejudice either side. The absence of notice was not treated as fatal on the facts. The restoration order was therefore not illegal or irregular, and the challenge to it failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399930