https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290981 The court quashed the proceedings in CC No.22036/2009 as the complaint failed to establish a legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that the payment for securing a job constituted an illegal consideration under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, rendering the contract void. The judgment emphasized the importance of scrutinizing complaint contents to prevent abuse of legal process and protect constitutional rights. en-us Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:07:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290981 The court quashed the proceedings in CC No.22036/2009 as the complaint failed to establish a legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that the payment for securing a job constituted an illegal consideration under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, rendering the contract void. The judgment emphasized the importance of scrutinizing complaint contents to prevent abuse of legal process and protect constitutional rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290981