https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290951 A second appeal was confined to the specific grounds stated in Section 584 of the Civil Procedure Code, and that provision could not be expanded by interpretation. An erroneous finding of fact was held to be distinct from an error or defect in procedure. Where the first appellate court had before it evidence properly admissible for its consideration, its factual finding was final and could not be reopened in second appeal merely because it was said to be wrong or based on a misreading of evidence. The challenge to the lower appellate court's factual determination therefore failed. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 1890 00:00:00 +0521 Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:17:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290951 A second appeal was confined to the specific grounds stated in Section 584 of the Civil Procedure Code, and that provision could not be expanded by interpretation. An erroneous finding of fact was held to be distinct from an error or defect in procedure. Where the first appellate court had before it evidence properly admissible for its consideration, its factual finding was final and could not be reopened in second appeal merely because it was said to be wrong or based on a misreading of evidence. The challenge to the lower appellate court's factual determination therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Apr 1890 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290951