<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 29 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23593</link>
    <description>Relinquishment of ostensible title by a benamidar in favour of the real owner or heir is presented as ending the property&#039;s benami character, allowing a possession claim despite the statutory prohibition on enforcing rights in benami property. A prior observation that property was benami does not create res judicata unless that issue was directly and substantially decided between legally identical parties. The material further treats a cancellation challenge to a relinquishment deed as failing where fraud or misrepresentation is unproved and the claimant knew of the deed long before instituting the suit, rendering the claim time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2019 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 29 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23593</link>
      <description>Relinquishment of ostensible title by a benamidar in favour of the real owner or heir is presented as ending the property&#039;s benami character, allowing a possession claim despite the statutory prohibition on enforcing rights in benami property. A prior observation that property was benami does not create res judicata unless that issue was directly and substantially decided between legally identical parties. The material further treats a cancellation challenge to a relinquishment deed as failing where fraud or misrepresentation is unproved and the claimant knew of the deed long before instituting the suit, rendering the claim time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>