https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290948 The High Court held that the attachment of the property did not automatically cease upon the dismissal of the execution case for failure to proceed with the sale within the specified time frame. The Court emphasized that the previous actions, including the attachment, were not invalidated by the decree-holder's inaction. Therefore, the order directing a fresh attachment was set aside, and the lower court was instructed to issue a sale proclamation upon a proper application by the decree-holder. Costs were awarded to the appellant in both courts. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 1906 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:57:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290948 The High Court held that the attachment of the property did not automatically cease upon the dismissal of the execution case for failure to proceed with the sale within the specified time frame. The Court emphasized that the previous actions, including the attachment, were not invalidated by the decree-holder's inaction. Therefore, the order directing a fresh attachment was set aside, and the lower court was instructed to issue a sale proclamation upon a proper application by the decree-holder. Costs were awarded to the appellant in both courts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Apr 1906 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290948