<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (1) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290935</link>
    <description>Interest paid on liabilities taken over on dissolution of partnership businesses was held not to be a deductible trading loss, because the distribution on dissolution related to capital assets and liabilities rather than trading stock or business receipts. The Court distinguished a properly ascertained business loss, which may be set off under the income-tax scheme, from a loss arising on capital distribution after dissolution. That loss was characterised as a capital loss outside the provisions governing loss of profits or gains, so the claimed set-off against profits from the assessee family&#039;s other business was not allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:07:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (1) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290935</link>
      <description>Interest paid on liabilities taken over on dissolution of partnership businesses was held not to be a deductible trading loss, because the distribution on dissolution related to capital assets and liabilities rather than trading stock or business receipts. The Court distinguished a properly ascertained business loss, which may be set off under the income-tax scheme, from a loss arising on capital distribution after dissolution. That loss was characterised as a capital loss outside the provisions governing loss of profits or gains, so the claimed set-off against profits from the assessee family&#039;s other business was not allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>