https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290932 When a refusal order under the Indian Registration Act is made without notice of the date of pronouncement, limitation under Sections 73(1) and 77 runs from communication of that order, because the adverse order is not operative against the affected party until it is known to them. A Registrar's rejection of an application as time-barred still qualifies as a refusal order under Section 77, and the statute does not distinguish between refusal on merits and refusal on limitation. Applying that construction, the application before the Registrar was within time when measured from communication, so the suit under Section 77 was maintainable and the remand order was upheld. en-us Tue, 26 Nov 1929 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:48:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290932 When a refusal order under the Indian Registration Act is made without notice of the date of pronouncement, limitation under Sections 73(1) and 77 runs from communication of that order, because the adverse order is not operative against the affected party until it is known to them. A Registrar's rejection of an application as time-barred still qualifies as a refusal order under Section 77, and the statute does not distinguish between refusal on merits and refusal on limitation. Applying that construction, the application before the Registrar was within time when measured from communication, so the suit under Section 77 was maintainable and the remand order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Nov 1929 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290932