<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23589</link>
    <description>The court found merit in the writ petition and ruled in favor of the petitioner-company, granting relief as per prayer clauses (b), (c), and (d). No costs were awarded in this matter. The challenge to tax recovery proceedings based on the cancellation of assessments by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was successful due to the lack of clarity on the assessments&#039; status and the need for modification of tax recovery certificates under section 225 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:28:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23589</link>
      <description>The court found merit in the writ petition and ruled in favor of the petitioner-company, granting relief as per prayer clauses (b), (c), and (d). No costs were awarded in this matter. The challenge to tax recovery proceedings based on the cancellation of assessments by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was successful due to the lack of clarity on the assessments&#039; status and the need for modification of tax recovery certificates under section 225 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>