<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1908 (4) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290931</link>
    <description>Joint family firm liability under a promissory note may arise where its manager, authorised to use the firm name, signs a negotiable instrument that is valid on its face and transferred in due course. Liability may therefore attach despite an underlying private transaction being outside the firm&#039;s business and allegedly fraudulent against the firm. The manager&#039;s status may follow from being the sole adult proprietor actively managing the business. Questions concerning lack of consideration, false representations, an agent&#039;s knowledge, and separate suits on dishonoured notes concern the enforceability and procedural handling of the claim. A technical objection to suing a firm does not defeat a straightforward claim against the maker of a promissory note.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1908 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:22:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1908 (4) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290931</link>
      <description>Joint family firm liability under a promissory note may arise where its manager, authorised to use the firm name, signs a negotiable instrument that is valid on its face and transferred in due course. Liability may therefore attach despite an underlying private transaction being outside the firm&#039;s business and allegedly fraudulent against the firm. The manager&#039;s status may follow from being the sole adult proprietor actively managing the business. Questions concerning lack of consideration, false representations, an agent&#039;s knowledge, and separate suits on dishonoured notes concern the enforceability and procedural handling of the claim. A technical objection to suing a firm does not defeat a straightforward claim against the maker of a promissory note.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1908 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>