<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 879 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399905</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition for unutilized CENVAT credit in the closing stock, ruling in favor of the assessee. The ITAT found that the exclusive method of inventory valuation used by the appellant was consistent and valid, resulting in no significant profit differences. Therefore, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 879 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399905</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition for unutilized CENVAT credit in the closing stock, ruling in favor of the assessee. The ITAT found that the exclusive method of inventory valuation used by the appellant was consistent and valid, resulting in no significant profit differences. Therefore, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>