<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 863 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant had legitimately availed Cenvat Credit on Dumpers/trippers, declaring details in their ST-3 Returns without suppressing facts. Relying on precedents like B Girijapathi Reddy &amp;amp; Company and Adani Gas Ltd, the Tribunal held the demand time-barred due to no suppression of facts, disposing of the case on limitation grounds without delving into merits. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 863 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant had legitimately availed Cenvat Credit on Dumpers/trippers, declaring details in their ST-3 Returns without suppressing facts. Relying on precedents like B Girijapathi Reddy &amp;amp; Company and Adani Gas Ltd, the Tribunal held the demand time-barred due to no suppression of facts, disposing of the case on limitation grounds without delving into merits. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>