https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9520 Violation of the audi alteram partem rule does not automatically invalidate administrative action; the key test is whether such breach caused prejudice. Courts must assess the nature of charges, the enquiry process, and whether facts are admitted; if facts are indisputable, remand may be futile. Where an affected party was kept completely in the dark and suffered consequential loss or debarment, a definite inference of prejudice supports judicial intervention to remedy procedural unfairness. en-us Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:59:06 +0530 Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:59:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9520 Violation of the audi alteram partem rule does not automatically invalidate administrative action; the key test is whether such breach caused prejudice. Courts must assess the nature of charges, the enquiry process, and whether facts are admitted; if facts are indisputable, remand may be futile. Where an affected party was kept completely in the dark and suffered consequential loss or debarment, a definite inference of prejudice supports judicial intervention to remedy procedural unfairness. Articles Other Topics Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:59:06 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9520