<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1319 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290926</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Assessing Authority&#039;s decision to tax inter-State sales of Fried Gram, citing the exemption under Entry 68 of the TNVAT Act. The court referenced relevant case law emphasizing the correct application of exemption notifications in determining tax liability. The impugned orders were overturned, and the writ petitions were allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1319 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290926</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Assessing Authority&#039;s decision to tax inter-State sales of Fried Gram, citing the exemption under Entry 68 of the TNVAT Act. The court referenced relevant case law emphasizing the correct application of exemption notifications in determining tax liability. The impugned orders were overturned, and the writ petitions were allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>