<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1609 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s petition to recall the order, citing the lack of evidence for the audit objection claim and the inapplicability of the prescribed monetary limit for filing appeals. The decision was in line with the High Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s miscellaneous petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:38:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1609 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s petition to recall the order, citing the lack of evidence for the audit objection claim and the inapplicability of the prescribed monetary limit for filing appeals. The decision was in line with the High Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s miscellaneous petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>