<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 841 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399867</link>
    <description>The tribunal addressed multiple issues raised by the assessee, including rectification of mistakes in the tribunal&#039;s order, exclusion of comparable companies like Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd due to functional differences, working capital adjustment errors, and incorrect references to sections. The tribunal carefully reviewed the submissions, referred to past decisions, and rectified the identified mistakes to ensure a fair and accurate adjudication of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 841 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399867</link>
      <description>The tribunal addressed multiple issues raised by the assessee, including rectification of mistakes in the tribunal&#039;s order, exclusion of comparable companies like Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd due to functional differences, working capital adjustment errors, and incorrect references to sections. The tribunal carefully reviewed the submissions, referred to past decisions, and rectified the identified mistakes to ensure a fair and accurate adjudication of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>