https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23578 A question already answered by an earlier High Court decision could not be treated as a fresh referable question merely because a special leave petition against that decision was pending before the Supreme Court. Pendency of the petition did not by itself modify, annul, or suspend the earlier judgment. In the absence of any interim stay from the Supreme Court, the Tribunal was justified in holding that no referable question of law arose. The application for reference was therefore not maintainable. en-us Tue, 03 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:13:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23578 A question already answered by an earlier High Court decision could not be treated as a fresh referable question merely because a special leave petition against that decision was pending before the Supreme Court. Pendency of the petition did not by itself modify, annul, or suspend the earlier judgment. In the absence of any interim stay from the Supreme Court, the Tribunal was justified in holding that no referable question of law arose. The application for reference was therefore not maintainable. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Tue, 03 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23578