<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 254 Rectification: Tribunal can&#039;t issue a second order for overlooked arguments; it&#039;s an error of judgment, not record.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55249</link>
    <description>Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - failure to consider an argument advanced by either party for arriving at a conclusion is not an error apparent on the record, although it may be an error of judgment and under such circumstances the Tribunal has no jurisdiction under section 254(2) to pass the second order. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:10:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:10:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 254 Rectification: Tribunal can&#039;t issue a second order for overlooked arguments; it&#039;s an error of judgment, not record.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55249</link>
      <description>Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - failure to consider an argument advanced by either party for arriving at a conclusion is not an error apparent on the record, although it may be an error of judgment and under such circumstances the Tribunal has no jurisdiction under section 254(2) to pass the second order. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:10:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>