<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 830 - BOMBAY HIGh COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399856</link>
    <description>The court found the review order to be highly improper and interfering with the administration of justice. It upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to waive the show cause notice and proceed with a personal hearing. The suspension of the import export code was deemed prospective and not impacting prior imports. The court approved the redemption fine and penalty imposed by considering various aspects. It found no fault in relying on an accredited laboratory report. The court directed the release of goods as the order-in-original was in force. The writ petitions were allowed, and respondents were instructed to release the goods without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 830 - BOMBAY HIGh COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399856</link>
      <description>The court found the review order to be highly improper and interfering with the administration of justice. It upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to waive the show cause notice and proceed with a personal hearing. The suspension of the import export code was deemed prospective and not impacting prior imports. The court approved the redemption fine and penalty imposed by considering various aspects. It found no fault in relying on an accredited laboratory report. The court directed the release of goods as the order-in-original was in force. The writ petitions were allowed, and respondents were instructed to release the goods without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>