<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 823 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399849</link>
    <description>Limitation for a section 7 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application runs from the date of default under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and a part-payment extends time only if made by the corporate debtor before expiry of limitation under section 19. Here, default was recorded on 31.08.2012 and the application was filed on 26.10.2018, so the claim was time-barred. The alleged payment on 18.03.2016 was not accepted as debtor-made part-payment because it represented sale proceeds deposited through the consortium bank from the corporate debtor&#039;s property. The insolvency application was therefore held barred by limitation and not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:44:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 823 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399849</link>
      <description>Limitation for a section 7 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application runs from the date of default under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and a part-payment extends time only if made by the corporate debtor before expiry of limitation under section 19. Here, default was recorded on 31.08.2012 and the application was filed on 26.10.2018, so the claim was time-barred. The alleged payment on 18.03.2016 was not accepted as debtor-made part-payment because it represented sale proceeds deposited through the consortium bank from the corporate debtor&#039;s property. The insolvency application was therefore held barred by limitation and not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>