<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 819 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399845</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Civil Appeal was dismissed because the tax effect was low. The Court recorded that the dismissal was only on that ground and expressly left the question of law open, so the order does not decide the substantive legal issue. Pending application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 819 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399845</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Civil Appeal was dismissed because the tax effect was low. The Court recorded that the dismissal was only on that ground and expressly left the question of law open, so the order does not decide the substantive legal issue. Pending application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>