https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290882 An arrangement that gave rights only over coconut trees and their produce, while prohibiting cultivation of other crops and denying exclusive possession of the land, was held not to be a lease of agricultural land. Limited permission to enter the land and maintain the trees did not convert the licence into a tenancy. Because protection under the Madras Cultivating Tenants Protection Act depends on a tenancy in respect of land used for agriculture or horticulture, the occupant was not a cultivating tenant and could not claim statutory protection against eviction; the decree for eviction was sustained. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:37:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290882 An arrangement that gave rights only over coconut trees and their produce, while prohibiting cultivation of other crops and denying exclusive possession of the land, was held not to be a lease of agricultural land. Limited permission to enter the land and maintain the trees did not convert the licence into a tenancy. Because protection under the Madras Cultivating Tenants Protection Act depends on a tenancy in respect of land used for agriculture or horticulture, the occupant was not a cultivating tenant and could not claim statutory protection against eviction; the decree for eviction was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290882