https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290881 A right to tap coconut trees and take toddy for consideration was treated as a lease of immovable property, not a mere licence, because it conferred an exclusive right to enjoy produce arising from land and depended on the continued productivity of the trees. The arrangement therefore required valid determination before any injunction could be sought against the holder. The alleged one-year oral lease was not proved, and the notice issued before suit was held insufficient to terminate the year-to-year lease on the evidence. The decree for the plaintiffs was set aside because the leasehold right had not been lawfully determined. en-us Thu, 01 Apr 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:15:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290881 A right to tap coconut trees and take toddy for consideration was treated as a lease of immovable property, not a mere licence, because it conferred an exclusive right to enjoy produce arising from land and depended on the continued productivity of the trees. The arrangement therefore required valid determination before any injunction could be sought against the holder. The alleged one-year oral lease was not proved, and the notice issued before suit was held insufficient to terminate the year-to-year lease on the evidence. The decree for the plaintiffs was set aside because the leasehold right had not been lawfully determined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Apr 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290881