https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290878 Revisional jurisdiction under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 is supervisory, not appellate, so the High Court cannot reappraise evidence or act as a second first appeal. Concurrent findings of fact, including a finding that the landlord did not establish bona fide requirement, may be disturbed only where there is legal infirmity, clear taint, or miscarriage of justice. Applying that limit, the High Court exceeded its powers in interfering with the concurrent factual finding, and the interference was unjustified. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:25:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290878 Revisional jurisdiction under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 is supervisory, not appellate, so the High Court cannot reappraise evidence or act as a second first appeal. Concurrent findings of fact, including a finding that the landlord did not establish bona fide requirement, may be disturbed only where there is legal infirmity, clear taint, or miscarriage of justice. Applying that limit, the High Court exceeded its powers in interfering with the concurrent factual finding, and the interference was unjustified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290878