<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 794 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-appeal as infructuous. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO under Section 153A due to the absence of incriminating material, affirming the lack of jurisdiction for such additions. The Tribunal did not address the partial confirmation of additions on merits, as the jurisdictional issue rendered it moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:02:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 794 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-appeal as infructuous. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO under Section 153A due to the absence of incriminating material, affirming the lack of jurisdiction for such additions. The Tribunal did not address the partial confirmation of additions on merits, as the jurisdictional issue rendered it moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>