<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Upholds CESTAT Decision: No Tax Concession for Goods Re-imported for Repair After One-Year Delay.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55228</link>
    <description>Benefit of concession/exemption - re-export - Delay beyond the period of one year - goods re-imported for repair/reconditioning of the goods - The learned CESTAT was justified in denying the said exemption to the Assessee and also rejecting the Rectification Application filed by the Assessee. What Tribunal has done is nothing but asking the Assessee to comply with the law. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:45:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Upholds CESTAT Decision: No Tax Concession for Goods Re-imported for Repair After One-Year Delay.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55228</link>
      <description>Benefit of concession/exemption - re-export - Delay beyond the period of one year - goods re-imported for repair/reconditioning of the goods - The learned CESTAT was justified in denying the said exemption to the Assessee and also rejecting the Rectification Application filed by the Assessee. What Tribunal has done is nothing but asking the Assessee to comply with the law. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:45:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>