<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 781 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399807</link>
    <description>A reduction of share capital under the Companies Act, 2013 may be confirmed where the special resolution is valid, creditors and shareholders raise no objection, and statutory compliance is shown. Here, the Tribunal accepted that extinguishing equity shares and issuing equivalent redeemable preference shares, while keeping the overall paid-up capital unchanged, was a lawful commercial restructuring within the company&#039;s powers. It also rejected objections based on the absence of a separate valuation report and the non-filing of Form GNL-1, holding those defects unnecessary on the facts. The reduction was therefore sanctioned, with consequential alteration of the memorandum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:37:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 781 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399807</link>
      <description>A reduction of share capital under the Companies Act, 2013 may be confirmed where the special resolution is valid, creditors and shareholders raise no objection, and statutory compliance is shown. Here, the Tribunal accepted that extinguishing equity shares and issuing equivalent redeemable preference shares, while keeping the overall paid-up capital unchanged, was a lawful commercial restructuring within the company&#039;s powers. It also rejected objections based on the absence of a separate valuation report and the non-filing of Form GNL-1, holding those defects unnecessary on the facts. The reduction was therefore sanctioned, with consequential alteration of the memorandum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>