https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399796 The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, admitted an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, finding the dispute raised by the Corporate Debtor against the Applicant to be spurious and lacking evidence. The Tribunal established jurisdiction based on the Corporate Debtor's registered office location and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, initiating a moratorium period. The Tribunal emphasized the need for genuine disputes supported by evidence, citing relevant legal precedent. The Applicant's claim for outstanding payment was upheld, and necessary compliance measures were ordered in accordance with the Code. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:09:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399796 The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, admitted an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, finding the dispute raised by the Corporate Debtor against the Applicant to be spurious and lacking evidence. The Tribunal established jurisdiction based on the Corporate Debtor's registered office location and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, initiating a moratorium period. The Tribunal emphasized the need for genuine disputes supported by evidence, citing relevant legal precedent. The Applicant's claim for outstanding payment was upheld, and necessary compliance measures were ordered in accordance with the Code. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399796