<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1342 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290848</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by M/s Login Radius LLP against the rejection of their refund claim for IGST paid on export of service was dismissed. The Additional Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the rejection due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide the required Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates as per CGST Rules 2017 and CBEC guidelines. Despite submitting some documentation, the absence of essential certificates remained a crucial issue, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Compliance with documentary evidence requirements for refund claims on service exports was emphasized in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1342 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290848</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by M/s Login Radius LLP against the rejection of their refund claim for IGST paid on export of service was dismissed. The Additional Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the rejection due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide the required Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates as per CGST Rules 2017 and CBEC guidelines. Despite submitting some documentation, the absence of essential certificates remained a crucial issue, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Compliance with documentary evidence requirements for refund claims on service exports was emphasized in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>