<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1341 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290847</link>
    <description>The appellate authority upheld the rejection of refund claims under Section 142(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, emphasizing the failure to establish the identification of returned goods and the deemed supply situation triggered by returns from registered persons. Consequently, all five appeals filed by the appellant for refund were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1341 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290847</link>
      <description>The appellate authority upheld the rejection of refund claims under Section 142(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, emphasizing the failure to establish the identification of returned goods and the deemed supply situation triggered by returns from registered persons. Consequently, all five appeals filed by the appellant for refund were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>