<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1675 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290869</link>
    <description>An easement is a right attached to the beneficial enjoyment of the dominant heritage, and it cannot be transferred separately from that land; however, it passes with transfer of the dominant heritage under the Easements Act and the Transfer of Property Act. The note also explains that a subsequent purchaser pendente lite cannot displace a prior registered arrangement establishing an easementary claim where the earlier agreement and connected conveyances support the transfer. The practical effect is that a registered transfer of the dominant land may carry the easementary facility, and later purchase alone does not defeat that right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1675 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290869</link>
      <description>An easement is a right attached to the beneficial enjoyment of the dominant heritage, and it cannot be transferred separately from that land; however, it passes with transfer of the dominant heritage under the Easements Act and the Transfer of Property Act. The note also explains that a subsequent purchaser pendente lite cannot displace a prior registered arrangement establishing an easementary claim where the earlier agreement and connected conveyances support the transfer. The practical effect is that a registered transfer of the dominant land may carry the easementary facility, and later purchase alone does not defeat that right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>