<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 766 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399792</link>
    <description>Inspection, sampling, chemical residue testing, grading and certification of fresh table grapes after production were not treated as support services to agriculture under Heading 9986, because the activity was undertaken for export and marketing rather than for crop production or preparation for the primary market. The ruling held that post-production testing and grading aligned more closely with technical testing and analysis of food and chemicals, and the produce remained marketable without such services. As the activity did not satisfy the requirement of a direct agricultural operation linked to production, it was held not eligible for exemption under Entry 54(a) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 766 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399792</link>
      <description>Inspection, sampling, chemical residue testing, grading and certification of fresh table grapes after production were not treated as support services to agriculture under Heading 9986, because the activity was undertaken for export and marketing rather than for crop production or preparation for the primary market. The ruling held that post-production testing and grading aligned more closely with technical testing and analysis of food and chemicals, and the produce remained marketable without such services. As the activity did not satisfy the requirement of a direct agricultural operation linked to production, it was held not eligible for exemption under Entry 54(a) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>