<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23556</link>
    <description>The court held that furlough pay falls under the category of &quot;Salaries&quot; for tax purposes, subject to sections 192(1) and 200 of the Income-tax Act. It found that the Income-tax Officer had valid reasons to believe the petitioner had not fulfilled tax obligations. The court concluded that the respondents&#039; actions were lawful, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s claims as lacking merit and denying the writ petition without costs, refusing to stay the order&#039;s operation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:14:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23556</link>
      <description>The court held that furlough pay falls under the category of &quot;Salaries&quot; for tax purposes, subject to sections 192(1) and 200 of the Income-tax Act. It found that the Income-tax Officer had valid reasons to believe the petitioner had not fulfilled tax obligations. The court concluded that the respondents&#039; actions were lawful, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s claims as lacking merit and denying the writ petition without costs, refusing to stay the order&#039;s operation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>