<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 737 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399763</link>
    <description>A landowner under a supplementary real estate collaboration arrangement is not treated as a financial creditor merely because flats were allotted in return for land and development rights. Financial creditor status requires a financial debt involving disbursal against the consideration for time value of money, and the allottee deeming fiction applies only where money is raised in the manner contemplated by the Code. On the admitted terms, the applicants were in the position of co-promoters rather than creditors, so inclusion in the committee of creditors was refused. The related request for handing over possession of the apartments or land was also rejected, and the applications were dismissed with interim protection vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:02:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 737 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399763</link>
      <description>A landowner under a supplementary real estate collaboration arrangement is not treated as a financial creditor merely because flats were allotted in return for land and development rights. Financial creditor status requires a financial debt involving disbursal against the consideration for time value of money, and the allottee deeming fiction applies only where money is raised in the manner contemplated by the Code. On the admitted terms, the applicants were in the position of co-promoters rather than creditors, so inclusion in the committee of creditors was refused. The related request for handing over possession of the apartments or land was also rejected, and the applications were dismissed with interim protection vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>