<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 734 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399760</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 7, ruling that the Corporate Debtor was not liable as a guarantor under the &quot;Unattested Pledge Agreement.&quot; It was determined that the agreement solely pertained to the pledge of shares and did not create any guarantee obligation for the Corporate Debtor. As a result, the Corporate Debtor was not considered a debtor under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, and the petition was rejected with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:56:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 734 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399760</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 7, ruling that the Corporate Debtor was not liable as a guarantor under the &quot;Unattested Pledge Agreement.&quot; It was determined that the agreement solely pertained to the pledge of shares and did not create any guarantee obligation for the Corporate Debtor. As a result, the Corporate Debtor was not considered a debtor under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, and the petition was rejected with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>