<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 738 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290837</link>
    <description>Where proof of service of notice before completion of a Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax assessment could not be produced, and the notices appeared to have been sent only by ordinary post rather than registered or speed post, denial of a proper opportunity of hearing was treated as a breach of natural justice. The assessment order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after granting the assessee an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 738 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290837</link>
      <description>Where proof of service of notice before completion of a Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax assessment could not be produced, and the notices appeared to have been sent only by ordinary post rather than registered or speed post, denial of a proper opportunity of hearing was treated as a breach of natural justice. The assessment order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after granting the assessee an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>