https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399747 The appeal was rejected as the appellant failed to comply with the conditions of Notifications No. 40/2017 and 41/2017, leading to the denial of the refund claim for Input Tax Credit under the Inverted Duty Tax Structure for November 2017. The court upheld the rejection, emphasizing the necessity of strict adherence to statutory requirements for claiming refunds under the GST Act. en-us Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399747 The appeal was rejected as the appellant failed to comply with the conditions of Notifications No. 40/2017 and 41/2017, leading to the denial of the refund claim for Input Tax Credit under the Inverted Duty Tax Structure for November 2017. The court upheld the rejection, emphasizing the necessity of strict adherence to statutory requirements for claiming refunds under the GST Act. Case-Laws GST Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399747