<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 709 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Miscellaneous Application as time-barred, emphasizing adherence to the six-month time limit under Section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act for rectification of mistakes in its orders. The decision underscored the Tribunal&#039;s lack of authority to extend statutory time limits, as per precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court, resulting in the application&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2020 13:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 709 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Miscellaneous Application as time-barred, emphasizing adherence to the six-month time limit under Section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act for rectification of mistakes in its orders. The decision underscored the Tribunal&#039;s lack of authority to extend statutory time limits, as per precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court, resulting in the application&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>