https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290821 An appellate court may interfere with an acquittal where material evidence has been ignored or the reasoning is untenable; delay in shifting the deceased to a hospital, late witness examination, non-examination of some witnesses, and minor medical-ocular variance do not automatically discredit credible eyewitness testimony. Medical opinion cannot displace direct ocular evidence unless it wholly excludes the prosecution version. The text also states that common intention under Section 34 IPC may be applied where the evidence clearly proves joint participation, even if no separate charge was framed under that provision, provided the accused had notice of the essential factual basis. en-us Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2024 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290821 An appellate court may interfere with an acquittal where material evidence has been ignored or the reasoning is untenable; delay in shifting the deceased to a hospital, late witness examination, non-examination of some witnesses, and minor medical-ocular variance do not automatically discredit credible eyewitness testimony. Medical opinion cannot displace direct ocular evidence unless it wholly excludes the prosecution version. The text also states that common intention under Section 34 IPC may be applied where the evidence clearly proves joint participation, even if no separate charge was framed under that provision, provided the accused had notice of the essential factual basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290821