<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 697 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399723</link>
    <description>A composite scheme of amalgamation and arrangement under the Companies Act, 2013 was sanctioned after the Tribunal found compliance with Sections 230 to 232, no material objection from the Regional Director or Registrar of Companies, and a scheme that was fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public policy. The Tribunal noted that the amalgamation would consolidate operations, improve efficiency, reduce overheads, and serve the interests of creditors and the transferee company. The default in appointing a whole-time company secretary was also compounded because it was limited in duration, non-deliberate, cured, and caused no prejudice to public interest, with a token monetary levy treated as sufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2020 13:13:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 697 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399723</link>
      <description>A composite scheme of amalgamation and arrangement under the Companies Act, 2013 was sanctioned after the Tribunal found compliance with Sections 230 to 232, no material objection from the Regional Director or Registrar of Companies, and a scheme that was fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public policy. The Tribunal noted that the amalgamation would consolidate operations, improve efficiency, reduce overheads, and serve the interests of creditors and the transferee company. The default in appointing a whole-time company secretary was also compounded because it was limited in duration, non-deliberate, cured, and caused no prejudice to public interest, with a token monetary levy treated as sufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>