<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 688 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399714</link>
    <description>Applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 are subject to Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so limitation runs from the date of default. On the facts, classification of the account as a non-performing asset was treated as the date of default, and the filing came more than three years later. No valid basis for extension of limitation was shown, and the argument that the right arose only on the commencement of the Code was rejected as inconsistent with settled limitation principles. The Section 7 application was therefore barred by limitation, and the admission order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 688 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399714</link>
      <description>Applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 are subject to Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so limitation runs from the date of default. On the facts, classification of the account as a non-performing asset was treated as the date of default, and the filing came more than three years later. No valid basis for extension of limitation was shown, and the argument that the right arose only on the commencement of the Code was rejected as inconsistent with settled limitation principles. The Section 7 application was therefore barred by limitation, and the admission order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>