<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 15 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23542</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the application, ruling that the issues raised regarding the interpretation of weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were findings of fact rather than questions of law. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the eligibility of specific payments and the allocation of expenses for weighted deduction, emphasizing that these determinations were factual and did not require a reference. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 15 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23542</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the application, ruling that the issues raised regarding the interpretation of weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were findings of fact rather than questions of law. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the eligibility of specific payments and the allocation of expenses for weighted deduction, emphasizing that these determinations were factual and did not require a reference. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>