<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 684 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399710</link>
    <description>The court held that both members of the Committee of Creditors (CoC), Kotak Resources and ARCIL, are equally responsible for reimbursing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) costs to the Resolution Professional (RP). The judgment directed both parties to reimburse the costs in equal proportion within 15 days, thereby disposing of the Instant Application (IA) seeking reimbursement of CIRP costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 684 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399710</link>
      <description>The court held that both members of the Committee of Creditors (CoC), Kotak Resources and ARCIL, are equally responsible for reimbursing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) costs to the Resolution Professional (RP). The judgment directed both parties to reimburse the costs in equal proportion within 15 days, thereby disposing of the Instant Application (IA) seeking reimbursement of CIRP costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>