https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290806 The appellant, a job worker, was found entitled to claim Cenvat Credit on inputs used in manufacturing job work goods despite the final goods being exempted under notification 214/86-CE. The presiding Member ruled in favor of the appellant, citing Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which allows credit for inputs used in goods under exemption notification 214/86-CE. The decision overturned the department's denial of credit and upheld the appellant's entitlement based on previous Tribunal judgments and legal provisions. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:02:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290806 The appellant, a job worker, was found entitled to claim Cenvat Credit on inputs used in manufacturing job work goods despite the final goods being exempted under notification 214/86-CE. The presiding Member ruled in favor of the appellant, citing Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which allows credit for inputs used in goods under exemption notification 214/86-CE. The decision overturned the department's denial of credit and upheld the appellant's entitlement based on previous Tribunal judgments and legal provisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290806