<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 671 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399697</link>
    <description>Pending adjudication of the anti-profiteering challenge, the HC adopted an interim balancing approach and directed deposit of the principal profiteered amount in six equal monthly instalments. The related interest component and penalty proceedings were kept in abeyance until further orders. Interim relief was thus granted partly, preserving the substantive challenge while securing staged payment of the principal amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 671 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399697</link>
      <description>Pending adjudication of the anti-profiteering challenge, the HC adopted an interim balancing approach and directed deposit of the principal profiteered amount in six equal monthly instalments. The related interest component and penalty proceedings were kept in abeyance until further orders. Interim relief was thus granted partly, preserving the substantive challenge while securing staged payment of the principal amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>